The Childless Western Leader Trend
A curious phenomenon has been noticed by those of us on the right. It is the childless Western leader trend. Biden is a figurehead, but Kamala, who takes the calls with foreign leaders, fits the barren mold. It is actually amazing to see it listed out but should come as no surprise. This is the physical symbol of the elite of the EU and American Left. When mapped out, the battle lines would require leaders that resemble the personal forms of the two sides. This also visually hints at why the Western elite will never pause immigration.
Each terror attack, each article on Latin American caravans and each border surge comes with more frustration at the elite doing nothing. This is not the case. This inaction combined with enabling the replacement of natives is what they want. We all know this. This is what the current regime wants and is old news. They want a mass of peoples who will have peasant values, enjoy the higher material standards of living compared to their third world homelands, and never become a rising elite to challenge these current elites. We all know the game, and we all worry about decay yet our elite don’t.
Breaking it down further, the battle is truly the childless, leftwing Europeans and Americans with their non-European allies fighting the rightwing Europeans (or European-Americans) to control the economics, natural resources and areas. As these left wing whites are not procreating, they are really fighting their genetic cousins to kill them off and hand over control to alien cultures. That is it. Childless whites allying with non-whites to kill off procreating whites so that the non-whites control America and Europe.
It makes perfect sense that all of these Western leaders would be childless. It is the perfect symbol. It is as close to suicide as they can perform because they are cowards. Beyond that, this is also the system selecting for the most dedicated to the system's goals. What greater dedication can one make to destroying native European and American cultures than to not have children in one's personal life?
These leaders are not making the decision to go childless now. They made the decision decades ago, when it still was a bit different. Maybe not in Germany where the TFR has been below Japan's since the mid '80s. This is a differentiator for the individuals sliding up the greased pole of politics when roughly any polished speaker can do their job. What type of marker does one need? "I'm dedicated, look how many times I worked for the party, hell I even sacrificed a family to fight for the party!"
It is not just about the system but a reflection of the culture themselves. Let us all be honest about the Clintons. Left to their own devices without the need to have a kid to run for office, they'd have both been single and childless forever. Obama might have been gay or found a white or mixed woman to marry. They felt the need to marry correctly and have kids because the electorate expected it from them. There is a natural revulsion or suspicion by many to childless men or women seeking power in America, so we still require our politicians to do so. Progressive politicians no longer suffer that same burden. Their population now has enough of a critical mass that will not procreate or carry on, therefore politicians need not worry.
This hints at the lack of concern. These leaders have no shared concern for what may come from importing the third world. Why should they worry? They'll be dead in twenty to thirty years and leave behind no one to suffer in case the grand replacement project yields an apocalyptic warzone in their homelands. The decadence and hedonism of today is the focus. The individual has priority, and individually, they will be cut down.