Normally, I review books but it is the dawn of a new year so one instinctively reviews what has happened and what is likely to happen in the near future. Things are a bit unsettled and multiple events that happened have been sorted yet no one faces consequences. Maybe we can look to a book in the past to parse the world of today. Alvin Toffler's "Future Shock," published in 1970, is a seminal work that attempted to foresee the trajectory of societal development. It was both praised and laughed at, but is a surprisingly fun read. While Toffler's predictions have not all come to fruition, his overarching theme of rapid, widespread change overwhelming individuals remains prescient.
Toffler's vision of a future where technology transforms every aspect of our lives was ambitious, yet some of his specific predictions fell flat. For instance, Toffler anticipated the rise of "telecommuting" or working from home due to advancements in communication technology. While the internet has indeed made remote work more prevalent, his vision of a mass exodus from traditional office spaces was overly optimistic. Toffler forgot the human element that managers need bodies to feel necessary and real estate needs tenants.
Moreover, Toffler predicted a shift toward a shorter workweek as automation and technological advancements increased productivity. Galbraith predicted the same. Economists always think of efficiency and always think labor will squeeze out a win. The reality is that many societies around the world still adhere to the traditional 40-hour workweek, with some even experiencing an increase in working hours due to the blurring boundaries between work and personal life facilitated by technology.
Toffler foresaw the emergence of a cashless society, where financial transactions would be conducted electronically. While digital payments have become more common, physical currency remains a significant part of global economies, challenging Toffler's prediction of a complete transition to a cashless world. There is too much black and gray market activity to end cash. As the West becomes more tyrannical, this fight for a pure cashless society will grow.
Despite these inaccuracies, Toffler's core thesis on the psychological impact of rapid change remains relevant. The idea of "future shock," characterized by the disorientation and anxiety individuals feel when confronted with an overwhelming pace of change, resonates in today's fast-paced world. The outrage of the day rotates quickly, leaving many confused. We live in a higher stress society with the anti-anxiety prescriptions to prove it. The advent of the internet, social media, and other technological innovations has indeed transformed the way we live and work, creating a constant stream of new information and experiences. We now have to deal with the information deluge Neil Postman warned about in the ‘90s.
Toffler correctly identified that the acceleration of change could lead to a sense of dislocation, as individuals struggle to adapt to a constantly evolving environment. Where do I fit in? Who am I? Even, what am I? The increasing speed of technological advancements, shifts in cultural norms, and economic transformations contribute to a sense of uncertainty and instability, echoing Toffler's concerns about the psychological toll of future shock.
Toffler's emphasis on the need for adaptability and resilience in the face of rapid change is more pertinent than ever. Toffler's insights into the impact of information overload also remain relevant. In the age of the internet and social media, individuals are bombarded with an unprecedented volume of information, often leading to cognitive overload and decision fatigue. Toffler's concern about the psychological consequences of information saturation aligns with contemporary discussions on digital well-being and the need for mindful consumption of information.
While Alvin Toffler's specific predictions in "Future Shock" may not have materialized as anticipated, the overarching theme of rapid, widespread change overwhelming individuals stands the test of time. The book serves as a cautionary reminder of the challenges associated with navigating an increasingly dynamic and unpredictable world. Toffler's insights into the psychological impact of future shock, the need for adaptability, and the consequences of information overload remain valuable lenses through which we can analyze and understand the complexities of the modern era.
Regarding the cashless society that hasn't arrived, insert the word "yet".
The Future isn't over.
Good post.
I think the tech changes mask the even more rapid and unsettling social changes, such as the common experience of moving to a different state every two years.