In Defense of Ontogenetic Masculinity

Part 4: The Method Behind the Madness

(Function, Solipsism & Books)

By Timocrat 3

‘The best way to bottle up anger is to turn men into women. After years of consensus seeking, reaching out, coming together, building bridges, linking arms and tying yellow ribbons, the femininization of America is complete. American men have been turned into their own secret police, under orders to kick down their own doors in the middle of the night and arrest themselves for insensitivity.’ - Florence King

In the final part of this 4 -part series I will now cover the method behind the madness of marginalizing and doing away with ontogenetic males. To review in Part -1 (link); we dealt with estrogen mimickers getting to boys in the womb and afterwards, while in Part-2 (link); we dealt with how as early as the mid-1800s real ontogenetic males started to be taken out of the education system. In Part-3 (link); the history of males that have given up their physical and mental masculinity for political or religious power was looked at, along with what female leadership creates scientifically in nature in both humans and primates. We also started to get into the goals of what this will lead to, and will expand on this for this final effort.

Their Education vs. Our Education

As shown in the Destruction of the Educational System A to Z (link) the oligarchy have pursued the dumbing down of the lower, middle and upper-middle classes as a matter of course for a very long time. By using females and effete male teachers, with an emotive curriculum, they have used the Prussian Educational System to make people more instinctive and emotive to ideas, as well as regurgitative of information.

For the top brass of the new technocracy, what they have learned is something quite different, so we will look at the multiple functions of their educational approach:

The terms and outline are taken from the book Principles of Secondary Education by Alexander James Inglis:

Adjustive Function- To fix the habits of the masses reaction to our authority and be passive to it.

Conformity Function- Make children as alike as possible (including genders), so that the market research done will lead to the more easily selling of the agenda and products to the masses. The same limited goods can therefore be sold to the wider group with fewer options, and in addition of course propaganda will not need to be as specialized and varying.

Directive Function-Diagnose the proper social role in dominance hierarchy & keep it stratified, or in simple terms make and maintain a scientific caste system, similar as you find in India (where they likely observed this in much detail under British Imperialism).

Differentiating Function- This simply centers on not letting the lower levels know what the upper levels are doing – or are truly pursuing in all organizations (whether private or public). Thus, each level in any hierarchy can lie, officiate and gaslight to the next level down, or all levels below, as in Freemasonry and all other occult groups. Yet this goes on across the board with government organizations, charities and private companies.

Selective Function- Darwinism Assessment of breeding quality of children and implementation of prevention of the poorer classes of reproducing. Tag the unfit with their inferiority by giving them poor grades and medial replacement and humiliation. Breaking their spirit and leaving them uneducated and unable to even articulate what is going on.  

Propaedeutic Function- Grooming those in the highest classes to manage the lower classes in special elite schools. Only a fraction of the population needs to carry on the system, as the manager class (technocracy) need not know the goals- as they need only follow directives and be good bureaucrats. A special technocratic language should be used among higher ups to obfuscate, and the common language bastardized by stifling and distorting it (by fashion of all kinds) with even the limited use of keyboard letters, and the encouraged use as emoticons.

Books, Paywalls & Kindle

(The True Fahrenheit 451 Burning of Books)

By the removal of books from libraries, and erecting expensive internet paywalls that make online information unaffordable for almost all, information can be limited to those in the know. The use of Kindle books is being used so that upgrades (or more accurately downgrades) to information can come to meet the agenda of political control over time- unbeknownst to the owner of the Kindle tablet or software.

Dumbing down downgrades can be masked as being politically correct upgrades for the hysterical woke useful idiots. If there is an Internet cyber-attack you can be sure the later Kindle books will be even more downgraded from the older original book versions. Only the older people, that read books or watched movies in their original form will know that the original stories, or documentaries, have been changed. Once that generation is gone the downgrade will become the new history.

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” - George Orwell, from the book ‘1984’

Adolf Hitler: ‘When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side’, I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already…What are you? You will pass on. Your decedents, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time, they will know nothing else but this new community.’  

The Book on Evil or Ponerology - by Andrew Lobaczewski

(An example of how books are delayed, shelved or hidden from public view)

We can all read the bible, but for those that are non-religious there is a version for you as well, though there has been much effort at play to make sure you do not get to read it.

A member of the Deep State (Trilateral Commission) Zbigniew Bzrezinski, who was born Polish and studied in Canada, is a great example of how the information and books are censored with little notice of the average person. As a Pole Bzrezinski was fully aware of what has happened to Poland over Polish history, and therefore should have been loyal to other Poles that would point to what has happened to their countrymen over several centuries, especially pertaining to recent history. So, when the author Mr. Andrew Lobaczewski came forward with just such an important book we can see how people in the deep state can act as total traitors to their own people and history.   

‘Andrew Lobaczewski describes how Zbigniew Bzrezinski, while singing words of praise for this book’s (manuscript) and saying he would see it published, in fact did his best, successfully (for years), to see the book did not get into print. -Laura Knight Jadzyk & Henry See

Now what was damaging in the book for this to happen between 2 Poles following on the heels of communism and WWII? Mr. Andrew Lobaczewski tells of many aspects of the those in power and also what I have tried to cover here in my series of articles. That is, as follows:

‘As a result of my long experience observing this phenomenon and attempts to track it to its source, I share the conviction with other researchers that this anomaly (Genes for evil or ponerology) is inherited via the X chromosome and that it is not transferable from father to son. (female transference). If the mother is normal on both her chromosomes, the son is genotypically free. In some cases, this is essential information so that punishment for the ‘sins of the fathers’ are not visited upon the sons. The daughters are then the carriers and they sometimes-more often than not, but not always-demonstrate some pathological characteristics. The questions as to why not all of them exhibit pathology is a question that needs to be investigated. ‘- A. Lobaczewski

So as covered in Part 2 & Part 3 of in Defense of Ontogenetic Masculinity in this series; we have the key trait in our societies and the use of the negative traits of many women, and most of the oligarchy’s male offspring, to see evil created via their state apparatus as has been done in the past, and is now underway presently. That these actual genes can be traced through women to the root of this ponerology has been suppressed, as to the which lines of women have had the worst collection of these traits would be most important to look into matriarchal lines found in our society’s elites. As stated most women can trace their genes back to as many as 80% of the original genes of women, as men are made up of as little as 20% of the original men. It is the fact that female lines have been left the least affected by human selection, while males the most.

Let us now look at female traits that are common and see if we can start to gauge the population as a whole:

‘Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included.’

-Karl Marx

Solipsism in The Female Population

The vast majority of women are solipsists, and so when combined with their hypergamy they become easily controlled by the Deep State, and a very unstable social form to base a culture around. Yet what is a solipsist?

This female dominant trait is specific obliviousness to any concern – or lesser prioritized concern – of anything outside their immediate existential needs.

‘Socially we’re living in an era of unprecedented (western) narcissism manifested in a vast majority of women… At no other time in history have women become more accustomed to perceived entitlements of personal security, ubiquitous social control and relative assurances of optimizing hypergamous imperatives. However, this narcissism is the result of an acculturation and learned social priorities that predispose women to expectations that border on arrogance. Women are bad at reasoning, but good at rationalization…The difference is that women don’t place as much value on Truth as they do upon self-preservation, and therefore their reasoning processes do not abort when self-contradiction is reached. They’ll just rationalize their way out of that too, if exposed…Women’s mental point of origin (solipsism) presumes the entire world outside of her agrees with her imperative and mutually shares the importance and priorities of it…An equalists, feminine-primary upbringing and acculturation predisposes men to accept the manifestations of this solipsism as ‘normal’, so we blow it off or nod in agreement without really considering it...’It’s just how women are’ and women are more than happy to have men accept their solipsism as intrinsic to their nature. It’s excusable in the same sense that women hold a “woman’s prerogative” – she always reserves the right to change her mind…

…Remember, nothing outside the female existential imperative has any more significance than an individual women will allow it. So, perceptually to women, if a man suits a purpose in her self-primary requirements he must also mutually share in that awareness of his purpose. Thus, she maintains that his imperatives are the same as her own…Social reinforcement of women’s solipsistic nature is a self-perpetuating cycle. A feminine-primary social order reflects in itself, and then sustains, female solipsism…that a woman’s first directive is to defend her sex’s imperatives even above considerations of religious conviction, marriage vows or espoused personal ideology. That’s the depth and breadth of feminine solipsism, and again, this reinforces a cycle of affirming it in women…

...It’s endlessly entertaining (and predictable) to see how often women’s (and feminized men’s) default response to anything they disagree with in regards to gender dynamics is met with a personalization to the contrary. It’s always the “not-in-my-case” story about how their personal anecdotal, exceptional experience categorically proves a universal opposite. By order of degrees, women have a natural tendency for solipsism – any dynamic is interpreted in terms of how it applies to themselves first, and then the greater whole of humanity…Men tend to draw upon the larger, rational, more empirical meta-observations whether they agree or not, but a woman will almost universally rely upon her isolated personal experience and cling to it as gospel. If it’s true for her, it’s true for everyone, and experience and data that contradict her self-estimations? Those have no bearing because ‘she’s’ not like that.

Women focus primarily on the context of the communication (how it makes them feel while communicating), while men focus primarily on the content (the importance of the information being communicated). This isn’t to exclude men from using personal experiences to help illustrate a point, but the intent comes from a different motive. That motive is an attempt to better understand the content and information of that issue, not an exercise in self-affirmation that feminine solipsism requires to preserve a woman’s ego-investments (usually her solipsistic mental point of origin).

The most visible manifestation of women’s rudimentary solipsism is the priority with which they expect their personal, existential, experience to be considered the most valid, legitimate and universal truth apparent in any debate.’ -Rollo Massy (link)

Mr. Lobaczewski, after seeing the effete roots of these personalities, then identifies them in the people that flock to the higher levels of any leadership that later commit all manner of the worst crimes against humanity because they press on from solipsism to narcissism and then full blown Ponerology (evil). Next Mr. A. Lobaczewski sees how hysteria, which we covered in Part-3 (link), comes into play:

‘Excessive egotism is a constant property of the hysterical personality… These persons, with dependent personality disorder, lack energy and initiative and passively let others assume responsibility for major aspects of their lives. Persons with passive-aggressive personality disorder express their hostility through such indirect means as stubbornness, procrastination, inefficiency, and forgetfulness.’ - Mr. A. Lobaczewski

So again, we see the traits women have, along with their effete males. From here we must look at the Deep State children in more detail:

‘Such young people (of the privilege classes) learn to disqualify and disparage the moral and mental values of anyone whose work they are using to over-advantage. Young minds thus ingest habits of subconscious selection and substitution of data, which leads to a hysterical converse economy of reasoning. They grow up to be somewhat hysterical adults who, by means of the ways adduced above, thereupon transmit their hysteria to the next generation, which then develop these characteristics to an even greater degree. The hysterical patterns for experience and behavior grow and spread downwards from the privileged classes until crossing the boundary…a society tends to develop contempt for factual criticism and to humiliate anyone sounding the alarm.’ - Mr. A. Lobaczewski

Is this not exactly where we are now when we bring up facts, morality and history with the woke class? This was foretold decades in advance. Single mothers bring up hysterical boys and girls in homes, lead to hysterical males and girls as a matter of course. For males, set upon bedding women, need to identify with this hysteria to do better, and so are more prone to mimic it or better embrace it to better results. You therefore have a whole assortment of males that are hysterical, as they lack masculine leadership from their kin more and more.

Men Communicate Best 

Men are better information communicators, yes you heard that right. Women and effete males talk more about emotions and do not deal with areas of concern outside of the pragmatic and inner-personal, and this is not necessarily beneficial to the culture at large. Men author and read immensely more non-fiction books than women. Effete males often make guru books (previously covered) that are centered on self-help, which really cater to women more than leading them in a better direction. These books are everywhere in our world- and to say women are better at the best communication is farcical. The transference of logical information is what communication of civilization is all about. So why has the deep state gone about enlisting women and effete men in its ranks if they are so unchangeable?  

‘There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.’ - Adam Weishaupt (Leader of the Illuminati)

‘When I am weaker, I ask you for my freedom for that is your principle; but when I am stronger, I take away your freedom for that is my principle.’ - Veuillot

‘Once made equal to man, woman becomes his superior.’- Socrates

Key Books:

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carrol Quigley

Survival of the Wisest by Jonas Salk

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Anthony Sutton

Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Anthony Sutton

Super Mob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Power Brokers by Gus Russo

The Pentagon’s Brain by Annie Jacobson

The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy: How an International Elite is Taking Over and Destroying Europe, America and the World by Ioan Ratiu

Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as a Conflict between Labor and Usury by E. Michel Jones

Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control by E. Michel Jones

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars: An Introductory Programming Manual

Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia by Paul Williams

Honor Verses the Amazonian World (Effeminate Leadership by the Chattering Class) by Mitchell Milo

The Rational Male by Rollo Massy

Next Million Years by Charles Galton Darwin

The Doors of Perception by Aldous Huxley

The New World Order by HG Wells

Political Ponerology by Andrew M. Lobaczewski

Summary

I have had some feedback on this series and the below statement would be my answer to those unhappy at so much detail, and so little call to arms. One must know what we are dealing with to counter its effects, and as for anger...

‘Anyone can be angry- that is easy, but to be angry with the right person to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, in the right way-this is not within everyone’s power and is not easy.’- Aristotle