For The Love Of Dog

Bestiality means never having to say you're sorry.

I embrace being a social pariah when I share my opinion on pet ownership. Not liking dogs has become the moral equivalent of baby seal clubbing. When I see the dog park being a main social attraction to meet others, I know we are at some strange phase in the collapse.  

A while back, my brother had a gig to help a back-issued, closet opiate-addicted boomer deliver boxes out of a beat-up FedEx truck. He ended up doing all the physicalities of the job. This meant getting chased down by Pitbulls while delivering boxed wine to some "almost divorced" leather-faced wench. He noticed a trend in dog food coupled with unmarked boxes when shook sounded like a rubber pinball inside. One day the faded boomer saw my brother's look of confusion over the packages being shipped together. "Dog Food And Dildos; It's What We Do!" Taken back with a heavy laugh, my brother asked, "you're joking. Right?". He repeated, "Dog Food And Dildos, It's What We Do!"  

Studying the topic of human and canine relations, I was bombarded with nothing but the positive aspects of dog ownership ranging from sharing the same bed to vegan puppy treats. However, diving deeper into the topic and using my own personal observations, I realized pet ownership has become a full-blown middle-class decadence and a terminal symptom of a highly stressed and depressed populace. 

Pet ownership has skyrocketed last year thanks to the scamdemic, with some 68 million people living with pets. It was also estimated that U.S. pet owners were expected to spend about $99 billion, up from $95 billion in the previous year. The industry for animals now has its own ETF that tracks businesses catering to pets. Housing is geared to canines where we no longer see playgrounds for children but areas designated for dogs to defecate in. We have ice cream for dogs, organic foods, plastic surgery, hotels, even sites dedicated to finding the best city for pets. 

Some females regard themselves as mentally unstable, having an infatuation for an emotional support animal. This has turned into a new meal ticket for those in the mental health industry and a colossal burden on society. The push for minimalist lifestyles puts heavy emphasis on dog ownership, where we have the image of the stoic alpha male with his "best friend" by his side. Pet owners may find the human need for affection is met most easily through a relationship with a pet.

What still holds true in most impoverished lands is that dogs are pests that run around people's property and eat garbage. They have no name, there're mangy, not neutered and are mutts. You do NOT want these dogs near you. A dog is generally worthless in comparison to a cow or even chickens. In the United States, they were used for hunting and protecting private property like farms and where I grew up chop shops. So they serve a physical purpose, not an emotional one. We always loved and respected animals. After World War 2, having a dog was a sign of achieving a household goal. The trope of the stable nuclear family. Think of the stick figure family decal you see on the back of a soccer mom's SUV. As the home disintegrated, the only thing left standing was the family pet. 

How did we get here? 

In Dave Sims tirade against feminism titled Tangent, he states: Clearly, this came about through the fault of fathers surrendering to the weakness they experience in dealing with their daughters. No lofty trajectory of the imagination is required to envision the centuries of pleading that must have gone into the winning of that first victory by a daughter over her father: inclement weather, undoubtedly, serving as the thin end of the wedge . . . 

"Please, Papa, it's freezing outside." 

. . . and, in the succeeding years, the rest of the civilizational barricades between man and beast falling like dominos. (Well, all right, just this once) KLUNK (Well, all right but he stays in the entryway) KLUNK (Well, all right, but keep him in the kitchen) KLUNK (Well, all right, but keep him on the hardwood) KLUNK (Well, all right, but he has to stay on the floor) KLUNK (Well, all right, but he has to stay at the foot of the bed) KLUNK (Well, all right, but he has to stay on top of the covers) KLUNK. Who can doubt that we're only a generation or two away from  "Well, all right, but don't give him the good china"? It's not hard to see the question that that first capitulating father asked himself and which each successive father asked himself as each successive societal barricade fell: "Where's the harm?"

The dog has supplanted both the spouse and the child to in developed country's and is awkwardly mimicked in countries with a growing bourgeoisie. It's astonishing how the human family can be replaced by incredibly unintelligent and short-lived animals without anyone giving it a second thought. There are many factors for this and some include lack of suitable partners, militant individualism, occupational stresses and the high cost to sustain a middle-class lifestyle. Even Boomers have embraced dog ownership because of an empty nest that was once filled with grandchildren. Has anyone else seen the bumper sticker saying "My grandchild has paws"? Or "Who rescued who? and my personal favorite "Dog is Love." Recently I saw a 20 something-year-old thot wearing a shirt that said, "I'm only talking to my dog today". Dogs have been shown to alleviate the perception of loneliness and depression and to improve perceived general health.

When you open up yourself to others, there is a possibility of dissonance. They may disagree with you; they may behave in ways that contradict the image you constructed of them in your expectations of them. Humans are autonomous, independent; they are abrasive at times and offensive. To date others is to take a risk to be vulnerable to have a weakness. To be refuted and not sustain a bruised ego. This can be summed up to intimacy. We cannot have intimacy anymore since there is a constant struggle on who is dominating who in the relationship and not seeing the other as a companion but as a competitor (domicile tournament theory). Do people want to make concessions or compromise anymore? Having a dog doesn't have any of these drawbacks. No disagreements, won't criticize you and are loyal. Dogs love us unconditionally, where humans is not.

Women imprint their biological urges onto their pets (usually dogs), where their dogs are a surrogate to motherhood on some physiological level with delusional affection. They create the person they admire and project it onto the animal. People gain validation from having power over controlling a dependent and needy creature. They will purchase dogs that they know very little about as far as their breed type goes, and for many breeds, they would not survive weeks without their owners. At times, women will raise a dog under the notion it will protect them since they have no dominant male in the house to scare away things they find threatening, like a guy who's interested in dating them (I'll know if you're the one if my Pitbull likes you). Women with miniature dogs give off the perception of ostentatious grandeur and haughtiness where average men would often find them to be high maintenance. Unbeknownst to the general population, these dogs were bred to keep fleas off women during the Victorian era. 

As for young childless couples, the unspoken bond of having a pet over a child is simple. It's easier to separate without a child than with one as the child strong arms parents into cooperating. Maybe not too far into the future, there will be alimony, dog custody and paramour rules of engagement.

Recently both Iran and North Korea have pulled in the reins on dog ownership, with Tehran Police Chief citing "vulgar Western culture "as a reason and Dear Leader Kim Jong-Un had ordered the ban because he believes it represents a "tainted trend by bourgeois ideology". The question I ask is, why did these 2 nations do this?

Given what's at hand in the west with the Transgender Industrial Complex and the sexualization of children, I have an idea where this is going.

Dave Sims went on to state: "In our society, whether we are consciously aware of it or not, if we have a name for "it," then we tolerate "it," whatever "it" is: at the margins of society and behind closed doors."  Since most of the population sees having sex with an animal as not normal, therefore, is not normal. But what if the majority says is okay, much like we the majority okayed taxpayer-funded sex reassignment surgery?

Bestiality is a form of utilitarianism, a sadomasochism form of maximizing pleasure-seeking, better known as zoosadism. Mostly western women will be the ones engaging in it since they are currently the least moored to any form of moral authority, they lack shame, remorse, have little to no belief in a higher Deity and loosely identify as "spiritual", whatever that means. We are also actively ignoring women's unscrupulous behavior. Men on the other hand,will just be gay since there is no shortage of gay men these days and is encouraged. In the DSM-V, zoophilia is classified under the general category of "Other Specified Paraphilic Disorder." The term is left vague, with no specification in the diagnostic criteria regarding the purpose, circumstances, or sexual acts of zoophilic behavior.

Google has recently changed its algorithm allowing bestiality pornography to pop up. Previously, it was obscure scientific literature discussing the topic in a negative manner. There are internet forums dedicated to sharing stories and exchanging advice; there are organized bestiality events and animal sex .

Then there is, of course, the social phenomena called Furries which is bordering on bestiality. A dehumanizing form of depersonalization with the demographics being White and below the age of 30. There is even a subgroup called babyfur that is interested in "age play."

With such heavy emphases that man is an animal, thanks to Darwinism and the scientific clergy, we genuinely start considering ourselves as animals. The most absurd part about bestiality is the question of the animal's consent and not for the fact of how grotesque the act is.

This all stems from the lack of pair bonding at the most malleable ages where you would find the person you cared and liked and stuck with that individual for better or worse. Yet when men have no sexual outlet and women are distracted by everything and anything during their prime years, this is what you get, a sexually deviant society.

These are sickening realities to contemplate, yet they are honest and with no stopgaps in place, I see more degeneracy coming as we broach the clownesque new world order where every day is the feast of fools. The absolute lack of maturity of sex and communication has given rise to where if aliens were to land in the United States, they would think canines rule over human beings. It will be a sight to see if the system collapses where fur mommas will roam during the chaos stage.

It's no secret you cannot take away what has been given. For us to even attempt to restore a modicum of common sense, self-control, and discipline regarding people's affinity for animals is an utter pipe dream. 

Dogs are a man's best friend and a girl's friend-with-benefits. 

Cheers to the Dystopia.